No notes on the poll. Your team is on the right side of it and the argument is over. The open question is where you actually go for a good one, so I checked nine highly rated Toronto pizzerias to find out.
Two of the nine came back with pineapple named. Both sit in the top three by rating, and the more interesting thing is not that they serve it. It is what they serve it with.
Sorted by rating, weighted by how many people bothered to leave one.
Reviewers at both locations order the capicola and pineapple slice by name. Cured pork instead of ham, so the salt does the work the sugar cannot. With more than 7,000 reviews behind the restaurant, the combination is hardly a secret.
A spicy Hawaiian, on the rotating specials rather than the fixed menu. Heat rather than sweetness. Small batch, closed Monday and Tuesday, and they sell out.
Excellent pizza, and pineapple did not surface in the menus and review text I checked. Which is not the same as saying they will not make it, and that gap is the honest limit of this.
How this was done. I used AI to surface nine highly rated Toronto pizzerias, weighted them by review volume, and scanned menus and review text for mentions of pineapple. I then reviewed the results myself. Nobody is reading twelve thousand reviews by hand, and pretending otherwise would be the least believable thing on this page.
This was not a full menu-by-menu audit, and these are not the definitive top nine. Two returned a clear positive result. For the rest, the absence of evidence reflects the limits of the method, not a definitive finding. The point of the page is less the result itself and more what you do with it.